Journal: bioRxiv
Article Title: Co-evolution of Oncogenic KRAS Signaling and LILRB high Macrophages Drives Pancreatic Cancer Recurrence
doi: 10.64898/2026.03.05.709991
Figure Lengend Snippet: (A) Volcano plot of differential expressed genes in macrophages between primary tumors (PT) and matched recurrent tumors (RT), highlighting LILRB4 as a recurrence-associated marker. (B) Dot plot of LILRB family genes’ expression across macrophage subtypes. Dot size indicates P value significance and color denotes expression change between RT and PT (RT–PT), identifying LILRB4 as selectively increased within LILRB⁺ macrophages. (C) Representative multiplex immunofluorescence (mIF) images showing LILRB4 + CD68 + macrophage distribution in matched PT and RT tissues; stains include LILRB4 (orange), CD68 (magenta), PanCK (light blue), and DAPI (blue). Scale bars, 100 µm. (D) Quantification of LILRB4 + CD68 + macrophage density in matched PT and RT samples (left) and paired change (RT–PT) (right); lines connect matched samples; P value from paired t-test. (E) Kaplan–Meier analyses of progression-free/disease-free survival (PFS/DFS; top) and overall survival (OS; bottom) stratified by intratumoral LILRB4 + macrophage density (High vs Low, separated by top quarter) in an independent 190 patient’s cohort. P values, log-rank test. (F) LILRB4 + macrophage density across clinical recurrence categories (non-recurrent, regional recurrence, and distant metastasis); boxes show median and interquartile range with whiskers indicating 1.5× IQR; significance is indicated ( P value, Wilcoxon test; ns, not significant). (G) Representative mIF images showing spatial co-localization of LILRB4 + macrophages (LILRB4 + CD68 + ) with Basal_KRAS high (panCK + CK5 + p-Erk + GATA6 - ) tumor cells in matched PT and RT tissues; scale bars, 100 µm. (H) Representative flow cytometry plots (left) showing LILRB4 expression in tumor-infiltrating macrophages from matched non-tumor adjacent tissue (NAT) and PDAC tumor tissue. LILRB4⁺ macrophages were rare in NAT and enriched in PDAC. Right, paired quantification of LILRB4 + macrophage frequency (%) of all macrophages in NAT versus PDAC across samples (****, P < 10 -4 ; paired test). (I) Immunoblot analysis of PANC-1 and BxPC-3 cells under monoculture or co-culture with TAMs, including control TAMs and LILRB4-knockdown TAMs (LILRB4 kd#1 and LILRB4 kd#2 ). Blots show epithelial/plasticity and lineage markers (E-cadherin, N-cadherin, Vimentin, KRT5, GATA6, TP63) and ERK–MEK pathway activation (ERK, p-ERK, MEK, p-MEK); β-actin, loading control. (J) Representative bright-field time-course images (Days 1–4) of KPC PDAC organoids (Pdx1-Cre; LSL-Kras G12D/+; LSL-Trp53 R172H/+ ) co-cultured with LILRB4⁻ versus LILRB4⁺ TAMs, showing enhanced organoid growth, morphologic plasticity, and invasive outgrowth in the LILRB4⁺ TAM condition. (K) Representative transwell invasion assay images and quantification of invaded PDAC cells after treatment with TAM-derived conditioned medium (CM) from LILRB4⁺ or LILRB4⁻ TAMs. LILRB4⁺ TAM-derived CM increased tumor-cell invasion (*** P < 10 -4 ). PT, primary tumor; RT, recurrent tumor; TAM, tumor-associated macrophage; mIF, multiplex immunofluorescence; PanCK, pan-cytokeratin; PFS/DFS, progression-free/disease-free survival; OS, overall survival. TAM, tumor-associated macrophage; NAT, non-tumor adjacent tissue; CM, conditioned medium. See also Fig. S6 .
Article Snippet: The treatment arms included: Isotype control, LILRB4 mAb (250 μg/time/mouse), the KRAS G12D inhibitor (HRS-4642, 1.5mg/kg/mouse, Jiangsu Hengrui Pharmaceuticals Co., Ltd.), and a combination of LILRB4 mAb and KRAS G12D inhibitor.
Techniques: Marker, Expressing, Multiplex Assay, Immunofluorescence, Flow Cytometry, Western Blot, Co-Culture Assay, Control, Knockdown, Activation Assay, Cell Culture, Transwell Invasion Assay, Derivative Assay